RT Journal Article
T1 Silence in the collections – revealing science stories through Indigenous partnership
A1 Hartman Deetz
A1 Milly Mulcahey-Knight
YR 2025
VO 
IS Autumn 2025
K1 birchbark
K1 canoe
K1 colonial history
K1 colonialism
K1 craft
K1 craft science
K1 Indigenous
K1 Indigenous partnership
K1 Wampanoag
AB This article reveals the transformational value of Indigenous partnership for understanding the science stories within our collections. Indigenous objects are often poorly catalogued in the collection, with vague descriptions such as, ‘perhapes [sic] prepared by Canadian Indians’[1] belying provenance and worse, obscuring the scientific and technological contributions of Indigenous Nations. In this article, Hartman Deetz, a Wampanoag arts and education consultant and tribal citizen, and Milly Mulcahey-Knight, a white, non-Indigenous anthropologist and research assistant at the London Science Museum, collaboratively interpret two objects made of birchbark in the care of the Science Museum Group (SMG). The first is a collection of five pieces of maple sugar, stored in individual conical containers of twisted birchbark.[2] The second is an intricately designed model birchbark canoe.[3] Starting with vague catalogue descriptions, Hartman and Milly detail the use of the maple sugar as a medicinal plant, connected with other medicines and medical technologies in the collection. The model canoe is interpreted as a teaching tool for Ojibwe-style birchbark canoes which turned riverways into transport routes for trade and cultural exchange. This ingenious use of the flexible and waterproof birchbark also left its mark on London. As a central technology of the beaver trade, these canoes were profited off by London’s elite and even remembered in the architecture of Oxford Street.  
    
    
        
            
        
    


The research described took place during the planning of an exhibition at the London Science Museum on Science and Technology in North America in the mid-1700s. Milly and Hartman joined the team as the curators transitioned from a two-year-long research stage into exhibition planning. Hartman acted as a paid independent cultural advisor. Milly was on a four-month placement funded by the White Rose Consortium as part of her PhD research into Indigenous and non-Indigenous partnerships in heritage work. In partnership they identified objects and interpreted Indigenous science stories, to enrich the exhibition and collections interpretations. Overall, this article demonstrates that collaborative interpretation with Indigenous experts not only adds detail to the SMG and Wellcome Collection catalogues but challenges the silencing of Indigenous contributions to science and technology. 
NO Science Museum Group (1870), ‘Jar of maple sugar in birch-bark perhapes prepared by Canadian Indians’ [birch-bark containers]. London: Science Museum Group Collection Online. Museum no.: A675087. Henceforth referenced as Science Museum Group (1870). 
NO Science Museum Group (1870)
NO Science Museum Group (1926–1936), ‘Model of a birch bark canoe from North America’. London: Science Museum Group Collection Online. Museum no.: 1936-450. Henceforth referenced as Science Museum Group (1926–1936).
NO Science Museum Group (1870)
NO Science Museum Group (1926–1936)
NO Science Museum Group (1870) 
NO Science Museum Group (1926–1936) 
NO Jane Jackson, 1943, ‘Plaster model of medicine man sucking out disease with bonetube’. London: Sir Henry Wellcome’s Museum Collection. Museum no.: A656667
NO Science Museum Group (1870)
NO Science Museum Group (1926–1936) 
PB The Science Museum Group
SN 2054-5770
LA eng
DO 10.15180/252406
UL https://journal.sciencemuseum.ac.uk/article/silence-in-the-collections-revealing-science-stories-through-indigenous-partnership/
WT Science Museum Group Journal
OL 30